2005 ) Lecture 3 : Expander Graphs and PCP Theorem Proof Overview

نویسنده

  • Matt Cary
چکیده

Recall in last lecture that we defined a (n, d, λ)-expander to be a d-regular n-vertex undirected graph with second eigenvalue λ. We also defined the edge expansion of a graph G with vertex set V to be φ(G) = min S⊂V |S|≤n/2 |E(S, S)| |S| , where E(S, S) is the set of edges between a vertex set S and its complement. The following lemma shows that the eigenvalue formulation of an expander is essentially equivalent to edge expansion. Lemma 1.1. Let G be a (n, d, λ) expander. Then φ(G) ≥ (d − λ)/2. Remark 1.2. In the other, harder, direction, it is possible to show that φ(G) ≤ 2d(d − λ). For our purposes of constructing and using expanders, the easier direction shown in this lemma is enough. Proof. Let V and E be the vertex and edge sets of G. Let S ⊂ V with |S| ≤ n/2. We will set up a vector x that is similar to the characteristic vector of S, but perpendicular to − → 1. Then by the Rayleigh coefficient formulation of λ, we have that Ax ≤ λx, where A = A(G) is the adjacency matrix of G.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Course ”Proofs and Computers“, JASS’06 Probabilistically Checkable Proofs

Before introducing probabilistically checkable proofs, I shortly give an overview of the historical development in the field of inapproximability results which are closely related to PCPs. A foundational paper from Johnson in 1974 states approximation algorithms and inapproximability results for Max SAT, Set Cover, Independent Set, and Coloring. While the decision problems for various problems,...

متن کامل

CS 369 E : Expanders in Computer Science

for their meticulous note-taking. We also thank Microsoft Research and the Computer Science Department at Stanford. We had indeed advertised that we will be covering recent results in the course announcement. We had planned to cover Reingold's new result " SL=L " , which we presented in lecture as scheduled. Little did we expect that Irit Dinur would come up with a simple proof of the PCP Theor...

متن کامل

Notes for Lecture 3 Some Consequences of the Pcp Theorem

Let now φ be an instance of 3SAT with n variables x1, . . . , xn and m clauses. For each variable xi, let occi be the number of occurrences of xi, that is, the number of clauses that involve the literal xi or the literal x̄i. We write xi ∈ Cj if the variable xi occurs in clause Cj . Notice that ∑n i=1 occi = 3m. For each i, construct a 1-expander graph Gi = (Vi, Ei) where Vi has occi vertices, o...

متن کامل

Notes on Complexity Theory Lecture 22 1.1 a Pcp for Satisfiable Quadratic Equations: an Overview

We show here a probabilistically checkable proof for NP in which the verifier reads only a constant number of bits from the proof (and uses only polynomially many random bits). In addition to being of independent interest, this result is used as a key step in the proof of the PCP theorem itself. To show the desired result, we will work with the NP-complete language of satisfiable quadratic equa...

متن کامل

On the Hardness of 4-Coloring a 3-Colorable Graph

We give a new proof showing that it is NP-hard to color a 3-colorable graph using just four colors. This result is already known [18], but our proof is novel as it does not rely on the PCP theorem, while the one in [18] does. This highlights a qualitative difference between the known hardness result for coloring 3-colorable graphs and the factor n hardness for approximating the chromatic number...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005